Example: "LOAD Button: Click this button to load. Most entries simply describe the labels that are already readily-visible on a given dialogue box. It actually complicates CAD library management. The single-project-file structure isn't particularly valuable (S/W has the Pack-and-Go feature).
WHO USES IRONCAD LICENSE
It was a bit galling to see the heavily-discounted price offers right after I paid a higher price, and I now see that you tricked your new users into buying a soon-to-be-obsolete version.īeing barred from having an account in the forum simply because I chose to purchase a perpetual license and no maintenance plan was quite a slap in the face.
![who uses ironcad who uses ironcad](http://www.tecnetinc.com/img1E37.jpg)
WHO USES IRONCAD SOFTWARE
Having the file format change right after I purchased the software and NOT BE BACKWARD-COMPATIBLE was almost a death blow to my continuation as an IronCAD user since it prevents me from adding seats without complications or extra expense of upgrading. Not being able to export to sldasm or sldprt with the translator was an unexpected and stunning deficiency considering the price I paid for the Translator. The parametric architecture is fractured and disjointed.ĭimensioning in the 2D drawing module is too erratic to be usable.ĭimensions in the 3D module hide by default and it's hit-or-miss as to which object to activate to show a placed dimension. I started a bug list but then stopped because there were so many. IronCAD also has a bulk drawing tool, so you can quickly generate drawing sheets with predefined views for every part in your model, dramatically speeding up drawing time.Cons: It was quite expensive, considering the lack of maturity in the product. Furthermore, you can create separate or combined technical drawings for every individual part and assembly, all from the one 3D file. IronCAD provides a far better system from the ground up and still gives you the option to use the only beneficial feature of the traditional part system. IronCAD allows you to do this external linking without having to do it for every single part, simply choose the ones you want to save externally and you’re done.
WHO USES IRONCAD UPDATE
The only potential positive of the traditional way is that when you have one part in multiple assemblies, you can link it to update in every assembly when a change is made. This also means you don’t have to go through the tedious process of mating all your parts together to make the assembly, everything is already in the right place and fits perfectly first time. You can also still isolate individual parts to work on them, all whilst in the same file. This is also a much more natural way of thinking about your design, you can think of the design as a whole working system. Sizing parts to fit to other components in your design, and making them fit perfectly first time. So you can design in the context of your overall assembly and design. You can build 1 part or 1 million parts in the same file.
![who uses ironcad who uses ironcad](https://www.ironcad.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SimWiseIC.png)
In IronCAD, part and assembly files are the same. Parts made in a separate file can often not fit correctly the first time, so you have to spend unnecessary time going back and forth changing these parts just to get them to work the way they should have worked from the start. Designing this way means in most cases you’re not designing within the context of the assembly, so it’s harder to see how your changes affect the overall design, leading to a less effective design process. Even if these parts aren’t moving parts, you’ll likely still need to mate them to lock them down. If they don’t fit you then make changes and mate and align them again. You also have to go through the tedious process of mating and aligning all these parts to assemble your assembly, fitting them into their correct positions in a separate process to when you made them. This means you have to deal with many separate files that can easily be lost or misplaced on a computer and are hard to share. You model all your parts in separate files, then combine them into an assembly at the end with a combination of many different tedious mates and constraints. In traditional 3D CAD, part and assembly files are different.